Author |
Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905 |
plankgatan Joined: May 20, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden fur alle PM |
thought i post some big nice sharp C905 pics all pics is posted in 1024 x 768.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 09:22 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2010-09-15 15:52 ] |
|
razec Joined: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Mars PM |
Isn't this thread too early to be created?
btw, i loved the second pic very much, it still shows the 8 megapixel details(albeit some excessive N-R application) in purple fringing-free environment.
10 years at Esato |
PeterKay Joined: Jul 08, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: The Ummah PM, WWW
|
lovely pics but way too early.
|
JiSm Joined: Nov 08, 2007 Posts: 404 From: New Zealand PM, WWW
|
Haha, clever man! Noone else can post pics in here for ages! - Still, what amazing pics man. (I have K850 - so I guess any other pics look amazing HAHA)
"Back in the land of the long white cloud!" |
darknoob Joined: Feb 26, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
my K850 by C905
full size:
http://www.jup.co.il/files/d121cc28a0.jpg |
strizlow800 Joined: Aug 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Macedonia, Skopje PM |
Yeah, the outdoor shots taken with C905 are awesome
|
Wizardz Joined: Jun 14, 2008 Posts: 43 From: Singapore PM |
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion. |
razec Joined: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Mars PM |
On 2008-06-25 06:31:55, Wizardz wrote:
It seems like either the indoor or close up shot aren't that clear. You'll see some distortion.
Close up shots were also taken indoors, and indoor shots are typically noisy(that's if the software N-R is not present) unless N-R is applied and result to detail loss just like what many brands are doing
10 years at Esato |
ch33sehead Joined: Sep 13, 2006 Posts: 34 PM |
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone. |
Alf Nif Joined: Dec 01, 2003 Posts: 426 From: Sweden PM |
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Alf Nif formerly known as seiunUsagi |
NightBlade Joined: Jul 29, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Nessebar, Bulgaria PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
|
Alf Nif Joined: Dec 01, 2003 Posts: 426 From: Sweden PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:45:37, NightBlade wrote:
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
I haven't played with any cybershot phone at all.. My latest phone is the Z610.
Now I gotto find out if I want the G900 or C905.
I think I'd go for design and get the C905...
Sorry, just realised I got off topic
_________________
Alf Nif
formerly known as seiunUsagi
[ This Message was edited by: Alf Nif on 2008-06-27 08:50 ] |
ch33sehead Joined: Sep 13, 2006 Posts: 34 PM |
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
No, I just peeked at the EXIF data on darknoob's photo. I don't own the C905 myself.
Somehow I doubt they will put manual controls on a cell phone. |
Arne Anka Joined: Nov 05, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden PM |
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
In another thread it was concluded the C905 darknoob used is an older prototype (low light pictures taken with newer protos seem to be less grainy).
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Most cybershot phones (at lest the more high-end one) usually have image stabilizer. But nothing fancy as optical or sensor-shifting. Cybershots only lowers the ISO when image stabilizer is enabled to my best knowledge.
|
pravin_i Joined: Jun 24, 2008 Posts: 6 PM |
how u got c905?
|
|